Commanders of the Army of the Potomac :: Essays Papers

Commanders of the Army of the PotomacIn his civil war keep back Commanders of the Army of the Potomac Warren Hassler Jr. fantastically recounts the events that transpired between 1861 to 1865 during which 7 men were given the reigns of the Norths Army of the Potomac and asked to lead the Union to victory. However, one of the greatest commanders in history stood in their way Robert E. Lee, and each was pitted against this great ecumenical one by one and given the chance to make history. The first, Irvin McDowell was regarded in this book as a great soldier in his own remunerate but a terrible leader who displayed visible gaps in his preparedness, in his tactics, and in his strategy. He was the first to take control of the northern army. Not practically later towards the end of May of 1861 public Lee established a defensive hold along the small stream of Bull Run find in Manassas. During the Battle of Bull Run McDowell was crushed by Confederate generals Joseph E. Johnston and Pierre Beauregard due to weak planning and it became apparent that this in fact would not be a short-lived war. Next up was the most popular and perhaps the greatest of the commanders, George B. McClellan. After the embarrassing defeats at Bull Run he masterfully regrouped and disciplined the AOP as he himself showed outstanding military presence and was constantly increasing his knowledge of offensive tactics. From spring of 1862 till July of that year General McClellan was successful in driving the Confederates out of West Virginia and he was inching toward the southern capitol of Richmond when General Jeb Stuart under Lee encircled and outmaneuvered McClellans forces who were driven back and in the long run held at Malvern Hill during the Seven Days Battle. During this time period there was some shifting of control and the AOP was put into the arms of General John Pope. This book regards Pope as one of the most pathetic leaders of the Civil War as he screwed up and c hanged his ways during the second battle at Bull Run and sacrificed his men uselessly. Meanwhile, McClellan blew an opportunity to catch the Confederates off balance after he learned of Lees plans but stalled and hesitated for a day giving the southern reinforcements plenty of time to arrive and group together and the north escaped with a slight victory only after Lee decided it would be wise to withdraw his forces.

My Philosophy of Education :: Teaching Education Essays

My Philosophy of Education Philosophy of education helps educators understand the train of education, what should be taught, and how students learn. All teachers must think about these important questions. A philosophy helps integrate understanding into the educational process. My philosophy is that all children should be educated, because it makes our troupe better as a whole. I believe that if we can educate all children, we can cleanse our society in many ways. In my opinion, the topper way to educate children is using the pragmatism theory. Pragmatism is knowledge that is obtained and real through with(predicate) experiences and interactions with the environment (Tanner 1997). This is important in education because children learn more through actual experiences. They learn from their actions, some even being mistakes. Pragmatism is a practical approach and it will work well when teaching children. Pragmatists believe that we should improve society through m eans of education that are geared toward problem solving and must be ongoing (Encarta Online 1995-2000). This is a great point because learnedness is a continuous process throughout life and it is all about solving problems. A teacher who is a pragmatist will help students understand what is know is changeable, there are a number of ways to interpret events, and there is no absolute truth (Crooner, Knight, and Wiseman 1999). Pragmatism has been around for a long time. It was developed by the 19th century by American philosophers, one of them being John Dewey. To him pragmatism implied that education should represent growth in individual condenser to deal with situations, should be a continuous process that cannot be terminated by the completion of course requirements, and demands self-direction as opposed to authoritarian guile (Wyett 1998). This led to using the interests of students and their desires to learn as a main point in curriculum. I believe this helps in the cl assroom. If the children are interested in what they are learning, they will most likely learn that subject matter better. Along with this the classroom should also be democratic. In this process students will have their set respected, and their insights made available to fellow students and professors (Beck 1993). A philosophy in education is very important for a teacher to have.